The voter ID laws sweeping the nation have a clear, targeted
impact on voters that is detrimental to a fair democratic process. More than 24
states have existing voter identification laws. One such law in Pennsylvania,
the focus of this article, stands to disenfranchise up to 750,000 people in the
coming election by requiring a picture ID to vote, a truly staggering number.
Voter ID laws have the express purpose of deterring voter fraud, but many have
pointed out that the cases of prosecution for voting fraud are dwarfed by the projected
number of otherwise legitimate ballots rejected due to inadequate voter
identification.
While voter ID laws probably do deter any voter fraud that
might exist, the effects of these laws extend far beyond that stated purpose,
and end up critically impairing a fair election. Among groups of people who are
less likely to have a driver’s license, like the elderly and poor, these laws
have a huge potential to selectively disenfranchise large numbers of the most
vulnerable voters. This is fundamentally unfair, and is counterproductive in an
effort to increase democratic participation.
I do not deny that it is also important to the democratic
process to prevent voter fraud. A possible middle ground between the
Pennsylvania law requiring photo ID, and no ID requirement at all, is asking
for any document with the voter’s name and address, like an electric or
telephone bill. This would ensure that the voter is indeed a resident of the
area in which she is voting, while stopping short of imposing criteria too
steep for many to fulfill. A compromise such as this one would solve both
problems, and effectively preserve the ideal of a free election.
Disclaimer: I speak as an individual, NOT on behalf of Common Cause Hawaii. All opinions are my own.
Disclaimer: I speak as an individual, NOT on behalf of Common Cause Hawaii. All opinions are my own.
No comments:
Post a Comment